Teacher-Guided IFP Use in Smartphone-Restricted EFL Classrooms

Authors

  • Syafaruddin Marpaung Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Interactive Flat Panel; EFL classroom; smartphone restriction; digital learning; student engagement; critical thinking

Abstract

This study explored the use of Interactive Flat Panel (IFP) as a teacher-guided digital learning medium in smartphone-restricted English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom. The study was conducted in eight Grade XI classes involving 266 students at a public senior high school in Indonesia, where students were not allowed to bring personal smartphones due to concerns about distraction, reduced learning focus, and dependence on artificial intelligence tools for instant answers. This situation created a pedagogical need for controlled digital learning that supported interaction without allowing uncontrolled gadget use. Using a descriptive qualitative case study approach, data were collected through six classroom observations, field notes, teacher reflection, and students’ open-ended responses. The study examined how the English teacher integrated IFP into classroom activities, including listening practice through Natural Reader, conversational exposure through YouTube videos, and interactive exercises through Quizizz, Wordwall, Educaplay, and other digital platforms. The findings indicated that IFP use helped maintain students’ attention, increased classroom participation, supported multimodal language exposure, and encouraged students to respond, discuss, and think more critically during learning activities. The study also showed that IFP functioned not merely as a display tool, but as a controlled digital learning environment that bridged technology restriction and interactive language learning. Therefore, teacher-guided IFP use offered a practical strategy for promoting focused, inclusive, and engaging EFL instruction in smartphone-restricted school contexts.

3 4

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., & Marín, V. I. (2020). Digital transformation in education: A systematic review of research on student engagement. Educational Research Review, 31, 100363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100363

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.

Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Teo, Y. H. (2023). TPACK in the digital age: A systematic review of research trends and future directions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 345–368.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Deng, L., Zhou, Y., & Broadbent, J. (2024). Distraction, multitasking and self-regulation inside university classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 23957–23979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12786-w

Dooly, M., & Sadler, R. (2020). Technology-mediated interaction in language learning: A review of research and practice. Language Learning & Technology, 24(2), 1–18.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Hennessy, S., Haßler, B., & Hofmann, R. (2022). Interactive displays in the classroom: A systematic review of research on pedagogical practices and learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 182, 104468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104468

Jayadi, U. (2025). The role of interactive flat panel (IFP) in shaping Indonesia's digital learning policy: A vision for educational reform in the Prabowo–Gibran era. International Journal of Education and Digital Learning, 3(6), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.47353/ijedl.v3i6.354

Kates, A. W., Wu, H., & Corneille, M. A. (2023). Smartphone distraction in the classroom: A meta-analysis of the effects on learning outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 35(1), 1–28.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2022). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19.

Martin, F., Long, S., Haywood, K., & Xie, K. (2025). Digital distractions in education: A systematic review of research on causes, consequences and prevention strategies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73, 3423–3451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10550-6

Mercader, C., & Gairín, J. (2020). Technology integration in the classroom: A study of interactive flat panels and their impact on teaching practices. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(4), 467–480.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020

Redmond, P., Heffernan, A., & Abawi, L. (2023). Student engagement in digital learning environments: A conceptual framework. Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3), 215–234.

Satar, H. M., & Akcan, S. (2023). Technology-mediated interaction and communicative competence in EFL classrooms. Language Learning Journal, 51(2), 156–172.

Teng, M. F., & Wang, C. (2023). Assessing academic writing self-efficacy belief and writing performance in a foreign language context. Foreign Language Annals, 56(1), 144–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12638

Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., & Siddiq, F. (2021). Technology integration in education: A systematic review of teacher-related factors. Educational Research Review, 34, 100400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100400

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wahyuni, S., Suryani, D., & Rahayu, P. (2025). Interactive learning media in EFL classrooms: The role of interactive flat panels in improving language skills. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 16(2), 356–368.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yu, Z. (2023). Technology-enhanced language learning: A meta-analysis of the effects on student outcomes. Computers & Education, 195, 104715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104715

Downloads

Published

2026-08-26

How to Cite

Marpaung, S. (2026). Teacher-Guided IFP Use in Smartphone-Restricted EFL Classrooms. Proceedings of Annual Language, Literature and Culture International Conference, 2026(1). https://conference.sastra.uisu.ac.id/index.php/alicio/article/view/27

Similar Articles

1-10 of 27

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.