Islamic Modernity in Malaysia-Russia Space Cooperation: A Critical Discourse Analysis
Keywords:
Astronaut Program; Malaysia–Russia Relations; Critical Discourse Analysis; Space Diplomacy; Muslim Modernity; Islamic IdentityAbstract
This study examines how Malaysia–Russia space cooperation is discursively constructed in government documents, media reports, official speeches, and religious guidelines associated with Malaysia's National Astronaut Programme. Employing Norman Fairclough's Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), this research analyzes the three dimensions of discourse: text, discursive practice, and social practice. The findings reveal that the Astronaut Programme functions not merely as a scientific project but as a diplomatic instrument that constructs Malaysia's image as a modern Muslim nation capable of integrating Islamic values with scientific and technological advancement. The discourse surrounding Sheikh Muszaphar Shukor's mission to the International Space Station (ISS) repeatedly represents the astronaut as a symbol of national pride, religious identity, and scientific progress. Through lexical choices such as "Muslim astronaut," "national achievement," and "strategic partnership," the texts construct a narrative in which Islam and science are presented as mutually supportive rather than contradictory. The analysis also demonstrates that the mission served as a form of space diplomacy, strengthening bilateral relations between Malaysia and Russia while promoting a global image of Islam compatible with modern scientific development. At the level of social practice, the discourse reflects broader negotiations concerning Islamic modernity, national identity, and Malaysia's position within the international community. This study contributes to the understanding of how language constructs meaning, identity, and power relations in contemporary science diplomacy and religious discourse.
Downloads
References
Alhattab, A., & Jamil, M. (2024). Islam and science in contemporary Muslim discourse: Reassessing the harmony paradigm. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 14(2), 45–61.
Brooke, J. H. (2014). Science and religion: Some historical perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Cross, M. K. D., & Pekkanen, S. M. (2023). Science diplomacy and international cooperation in the twenty-first century. Global Policy, 14(3), 412–426.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
Hart, C. (2023). Critical discourse studies and cognitive linguistics. Bloomsbury.
Houston, K. (2025). Writing and sustaining the Ummah: Reflection, alterity and strategic framing in the official discourse of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. Politics, 45(4), 550–571.
Lu, Y., & Zhou, X. (2024). A critical discourse analysis of Chinese diplomatic speeches on Chinese-US relations. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1674.
Muratbekova, A. (2023). Science diplomacy and international scientific cooperation in contemporary international relations. Journal of International Studies, 16(2), 55–72.
Nasr, S. H. (2006). Science and civilization in Islam. Islamic Texts Society.
Olsakova, D. (2024). Science diplomacy and soft power in contemporary international relations. International Politics Review, 12(1), 88–105.
Polkowska, M. (2020). Space diplomacy: Future perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences, 27(3), 121–128.
Richardson, J. E. (2020). Analysing newspapers: An approach from critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Traphagan, J. W. (2020). Religion and human space exploration: An anthropological perspective. Anthropology and Humanism, 45(2), 156–173.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2023). Methods of critical discourse studies (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zook, D. C. (2010). Technology, Islam, and national identity: The Malaysian space programme and the politics of modernity. Asian Studies Review, 34(2), 165–180.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Proceedings of Annual Language, Literature and Culture International Conference

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.